Legal Opinion

Forbell v. Forbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by defendant from so much of order made in an action for judgment of separation as grants motion of defendant to vacate a judgment for plaintiff upon condition that he appear generally and serve an answer. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The effect of defendant’s application to vacate the judgment, open his default and serve the answer proposed by him and to defend on the merits, constituted a general appearance (Farmer v. National Life Assn., 138 N. Y. 265, 270; Henderson v. Henderson, 247 N. Y. 428, 432-433; Dyker Heights Home for Blind…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Farmer v. National Life Ass'n of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Dyker Heights Home for Blind Children, Inc. v. StolitzkyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Petker v. RudolphNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Petker v. RudolphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Apfelbaum v. American Binder Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chapman v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. In re the Estate of MartinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API