Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlos Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 3, 2002No. 01-13212PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal concerns whether a prior adjudication, but not a conviction, for a felony under New York’s youthful offender statute can be used for sentencing enhancement. Carlos Acosta pled guilty in federal court to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. At sentencing, the district court determined that Acosta’s prior youthful offender adjudication from New York qualified as a prior conviction for purposes of sentencing enhancement, and denied Acosta “safety valve” relief. Acosta appeals. We affirm.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard Quinton CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Jose Mejias, A/K/A Meija, JoeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Richard D. Fernandez, Jr., United States of America v. Steven E. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Reco Vondell JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. PetrosDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. LawCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Juma SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Donald Daye StorerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Zuniga-ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API