Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Wormuth
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-3481Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-cv-3481 DANIEL DRISCOLL, 1 Secretary of the Army, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff James Murphy retired from the Army as a Sergeant First Class after more than thirty years of service. In 2023, he sued the Army, alleging that its Board for the Correction of Military Records violated the Administrative Procedure Act in 2022 by denying him medical disability retirement. Both parties cross-moved for summary judgment. Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. at 1–21, ECF No. 14-1 (“Def.’s Mot.”);…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sendra Corporation v. John W. Magaw, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, U.S. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.