Legal Opinion

Smith v. Champagne

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOrton, J.

This action is brought to recover the highest market price, of $6 per thousand feet, for cutting and removing 600,000 feet of pine timber and logs from a tract of land then belonging to the state and since purchased by the plaintiff. The defendants are charged with having committed such trespasses since January 1,1880. The defendant Champagne admits, in his answer, that he cut and removed from said land 400,000 feet of pine logs in the winter of 1877 and 1878, and denies that he has done any such cutting within the period of six years before the commencement of this action, and denies the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hinton v. Cream City RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McLimans v. City of LancasterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Smith v. LanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Mullen v. ReinigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kayser v. HartnettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hooker v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Clithero v. FennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Schillinger v. Town of VeronaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Parkes v. LindenmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bigelow v. SicklesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API