Legal Opinion
Bridgestone/Firestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. United States
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided August 23, 2004No. 3:02-0994Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOHN T. NIXON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Bridgestone/Fire-stone Americas Holding, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “BF”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26). Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff United States of America (“Defendant”) has filed a response in opposition (Doc. No. 35), and BF has filed a reply (Doc. No. 39). For the reasons stated below, BF’s motion is DENIED.
Background
Plaintiff sells and markets a tire, the Series L317, Size 12.00R24 tire (“the Tire”), for use in the coal, lumber, and oil-rigging…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.