Legal Opinion

Otterness v. Horsley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1978No. 47254Published

1Opinion of the Court

263 N.W.2d 403 (1978)

Gene R. OTTERNESS, et al., Appellants,

v.

Daniel Joseph HORSLEY, et al., Respondents.

No. 47254.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 10, 1978.

Edward F. Rooney, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Kelley Torrison & O'Neill and Timothy J. Dwyer, St. Paul, for respondents.

Heard before ROGOSHESKE, KELLY, and YETKA, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.

KELLY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiffs' cause of action against each defendant pursuant to a special jury verdict in defendants' favor. We affirm.

This action arose out of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Riley v. LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bohnen v. GorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Messenger v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API