United States v. Garey
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
It is well-established that a defendant wishing to waive his right to counsel may do so by invoking his right to self-representation and confirming his knowing choice through a cooperative dialogue with the court. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2541, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). This case requires us to address the situation in which an uncooperative defendant adamantly and knowingly rejects the competent counsel to which he is constitutionally entitled, but also refuses to invoke affirmatively his right to self-representation.
Defendant-Appellant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- United States v. KaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- State v. DeanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- In re: Courtney WildCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.