Herrin v. State

It is earnestly contended by able counsel for the plaintiff in error that the evidence for the State merely shows a meretricious, corrupt transaction on the part of the prosecutrix. Counsel quote certain portions of the evidence which, if s.uch were all the evidence, would justify their learned, eloquent, and persuasive argument. For this reason, and in order to get all of the evidence on which to base our decision of the case, we have set forth in full the testimony of the prosecutrix. This court held in Adams v. State, 58 Ga. App. 632 (199 S. E. 542) : “Whether or not the prosecutrix…