Woodard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment fox seduction, from Laurens superior court — Judge 'Martin. October 17, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of seduction, ••and his motion for a new trial was overruled. Besides the general *448grounds, he makes numerous assignments of error, based on the charge of the court, and one assignment of error on the ruling of the court restricting the defendant in his statement to the jury. The assignments of error directed against the charge of the court can be easily reduced in number; and so reduced, we will take them up in their order.
1. Several of these exceptions apply to the charge of the court in treating the question as to what constituted a virtuous unmarried…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Nobles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- O'Neill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Disharoon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Corbin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Durrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Dougherty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.