Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Ry. Co. v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the circuit court of Tunica county. Hon. J. H. Wynn, Judge. The facts are stated in tbe opinion. After the passage of the statute under construction in this cause and under which the appellant was indicted, an act of the legislature was passed and approved March 14, 1888, which was amendatory of the general act of 1884, known as the “railroad supervision bill.”

Read the full summary

From the circuit court of Tunica county. Hon. J. H. Wynn, Judge. The facts are stated in tbe opinion. After the passage of the statute under construction in this cause and under which the appellant was indicted, an act of the legislature was passed and approved March 14, 1888, which was amendatory of the general act of 1884, known as the “railroad supervision bill.” Section - 3 of this act is as follows : “ Every conductor of trains carrying passengers in this state is hereby authorized to assign passengers to any car or to seats in a particular part of any ear on his train; provided, that…

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On the 2d of March, 1888, the legislature of this state passed an act entitled, “ An act to promote the comfort of passengers on railroad trains,” which is as follows :

“ Section 1. That all railroads carrying passengers in this state (other than street railroads) shall provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing two or more passenger cars for each passenger train, or by dividing the passenger cars by a partition so as to sequre separate accommodations.

Section 2. That the conductors of such passenger…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Bailey v. PattersonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1961
  3. Anderson v. Louisville & N. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1894
  4. Ex parte PlessySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Coleman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API