Legal Opinion

Klein v. Opert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 28, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Motion by the appellants to *785amend the remittitur clause of a decision and order of this Court, dated February 28, 1994 (201 AD2d 705), which determined an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 9, 1992. Cross motion by the respondents, in effect, for reargument of the appeal, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and cross motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic in light of our determination upon the cross motion; and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zev v. MermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. 3M Holding Corp. v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Tarlo v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Sohayegh v. OberlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. GDJS Corp. v. 917 Properties Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kattas v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Ennin v. CarionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Sakizada v. GBR Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API