Legal Opinion

Sohayegh v. Oberlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 1989PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lodato, J.), dated November 4, 1988, as conditioned the granting of his motion for summary judgment upon his consent to the appointment of an independent appraiser by the court, and performing the contract in accordance with the appraiser’s findings as to the current fair market value of the subject real property, and the defendant cross-appeals, as limited by his notice of cross…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grace v. NappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Zev v. MermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Ballen v. PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Schmidt v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Royce v. RymkevitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. 3M Holding Corp. v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Hand v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Savitsky v. SukenikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Mohen v. MooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Revital Realty Group, LLC v. Ulano Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API