Legal Opinion

Bardavid v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF’THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Transit Authority owes no duty to protect a person on its premises from assault by a third person absent facts establishing a special relationship between the Authority and the person assaulted (Weiner v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 55 NY2d 175). By installing an electric sign to inform prospective passengers of the arrival of the elevator to take them down to the subway platform, the Transit Authority assumed no special duty to plaintiff; moreover, plaintiff’s descent into the alcove giving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Weiner v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helman v. County of WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Pascarella v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Crosland v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Rivera v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Jaramillo v. Callen RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API