Floyd by and Through Floyd v. Boyd Bros.

When one reasonable view of the evidence supports the trial court’s judgment, the judgment must be upheld, even if another, perhaps better reasoned, view of the evidence might have dictated a different outcome. Ex parte Veazey, 637 So.2d 1348 (Ala.1993). I respectfully dissent, because I believe the trial judge heard evidence from which he could have determined that the test of legal and medical causation was not met.

First of all, “[ejxpert opinions in workmen’s compensation eases are not binding on the trial court, even when uncontroverted.” Neely Track Line, Inc. v. Jones, 624 So.2d 1385,…