Legal Opinion

Funkhauser v. Goodrich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a tort action. Plaintiff, a man 41 years of age, who was employed by defendant as a ranch hand, seeks to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from being lacked by a cow while he was undertaking to milk her. Over the objection of the defendant, the cause was submitted to a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,100.00. Defendant appeals asserting, among other things, that there is no evidence to support the judgment and that he was entitled to a directed verdict. Plaintiff-respondent makes no appearance here.

Defendant’s ranch is located a few…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Kelly Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Schnell v. HowittOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Miller v. Kelly Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Chance v. Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey, Combined Shows Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Brooks v. MacKOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Moody v. RasmussenOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Chance v. Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey, Combined Shows Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API