Legal Opinion
Ritz v. Ritz
New York City Family Court
Decided October 31, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
George D. Marlow, J.
Brenda Ritz, by her objection pursuant to Family Court Act § 439, asks this court to review a Hearing Examiner’s order granting Kenneth Ritz’s petition for a downward modification of his court-decreed, weekly maintenance obligation.
This court has examined the transcript of the extensive modification proceeding held before the Hearing Examiner, the record and papers filed by both parties, the September 28, 1988 posttrial decision of Acting Supreme Court Justice James D. Benson and its modification on appeal, and the applicable law on the issue herein…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Holahan v. HolahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Matzke v. MatzkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Spadaro v. New York City Police Department Pension ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Berlin v. BerlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.