Legal Opinion

Spadaro v. New York City Police Department Pension Service

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin B. Stecher, J.

Petitioner seeks an order directing the corespondent New York City Police Department Pension Service Fund (hereinafter the Fund) to pay directly to her a portion of respondent former husband’s pension benefits pursuant to the terms of a New Jersey judgment of divorce.

The petitioner and respondent Chislett were divorced in March, 1979, following respondent’s resignation from the New York City Police Department in July, 1978. Since he had worked as a police officer for more than 15 years, respondent had a vested interest in a deferred retirement benefit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zwingmann v. ZwingmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Caravaggio v. Retirement Board of the Teachers' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Monck v. MonckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Epstein v. EpsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Cross v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kaplan v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Biddlecom v. BiddlecomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Kaplan v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API