Legal Opinion

Town of North Hempstead v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.

Plaintiff, the Town of North Hemp-stead, has instituted an action against three defendants engaged in mining sand and gravel within the unincorporated area of the town, to enjoin them from conducting sand mining or excavation until such time as they shall obtain from the plaintiff a permit as required by its “ Ordinance Relating to Sand Bank and Pit, Topsoil Removal and Other Excavations.”

Two of the defendants now move for summary judgment on their counterclaims and for judgment dismissing the complaint. Considered on these motions in addition to the pleadings and various affidavits, are the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Sperling v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Whalen v. CorsiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Miller v. City of Long BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Torsoe Bros. Construction Corp. v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Dock Watch Hollow Quarry Pit v. Tp. of WarrenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Richard's Service Station, Inc. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Town of Hempstead v. GoldblattNew York Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API