Legal Opinion

United States v. Augustinus Petrus Maria Kouwenhoven

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 1979No. 78-1415PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, urging that the sentencing judge abused his discretion and that the resulting sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment and violated the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the Fifth Amendment. We affirm.

Defendant, a citizen of the Netherlands, pleaded guilty on May 25, 1977 to conspiracy to dispose of stolen paintings in foreign commerce. 18 U.S.C. § 371.

The trial judge sentenced him in September 1977, but stayed execution of the sentence until December 5, 1977,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Dear Wing Jung v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Cliff KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Roger S. Bandy v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas and United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. James Lynn HootonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Clarence RuffenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Joe S. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Marquis BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. CRUZ v. DAVISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API