Legal Opinion

Hosier v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 2005No. 44949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an original proper person petition for extraordinary relief. Citing to Article 6, Section 4 of the Nevada Constitution, petitioner David Hosier challenges the validity of his 1990 judgment of conviction and requests this court to exercise its original jurisdiction to consider the merits of his claims. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the exercise of our original jurisdiction is not warranted in this matter.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The district court convicted Hosier, pursuant to a jury verdict, of seven counts of sexual assault and one count of a lewdness with a child…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bruce Wade Blair v. Jacqueline CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Wade v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1999

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chambers v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Adkisson (Michael) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Amezcua v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Chambers v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Chambers v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API