Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chambers v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2008No. 07-15773Published

1DissentWallace, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Chambers exhausted his state court remedies. Therefore, I would deny Chambers’ petition for writ of habeas corpus and would remand to the district court to direct the petitioner to file his claims in the Nevada state courts.

The majority correctly sets forth that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1), a state prisoner must exhaust remedies available in state courts before a federal court may consider a claim. Exhaustion typically requires that “state prisoners ... give the state courts one full opportunity to resolve any constitutional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Castille v. PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. William B. Greene v. John LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. John David Roettgen v. Dale Copeland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Mark Hayes v. Larry KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API