Legal Opinion

Stoudt v. Guaranty Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

The attack on the complaint is twofold. It is asserted first, that plaintiff is without legal capacity to sue, and second, that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. The first objection may well be disposed of by a reference to section 19 of the Personal Property Law. There it is provided that an administrator may for the benefit of creditors treat as void any transfer of property made in fraud of the rights of creditors. The complaint alleges that the change in beneficiary was made at a time when the insured was insolvent and done in fraud of the creditors of his estate. His right…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chatham Phenix National Bank v. CrosneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Gould v. FleitmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Feynman v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. United States v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937
  3. Union Central Life Ins. v. FlickerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Hechtkopf v. MendlowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  5. Beigel v. WindschauerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API