Legal Opinion

Alabam Freight Lines v. Chateau

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1940No. Civil No. 4239Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The appellee herein filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Such motion was granted but thereafter, upon a showing which we thought justified it, the order of dismissal was vacated and the case reinstated.

The appellant has filed its brief and made a number of assignments of error, to which appellee has made no answer. We have held, when appellee fails to answer appellant’s assignments of error, we will treat such failure as tantamount to a confession of error and reverse the case. The cases holding thus are: Skelsey v. Kuhn, 23 Ariz. 367, 203 Pac. 1082; Hatch v. Leighton, 24 Ariz. 300, 209 Pac.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hatch v. LeightonArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Adkins v. AdkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Skelsey v. KuhnArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Navarro v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Tarbell v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API