Legal Opinion

Stoeckman v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1884PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Barclay, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. ■

This was an action brought by an administrator appointed in Missouri for damages resulting in the death of his intestate, which took place in the state of Illinois.

At the close of the testimony, the court instructed the jury that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The plaintiff took a bill of exceptions which states that this instruction was given by the court with the accompanying announcement to counsel, that the action of the court was based upon the fact that, as the statute of Illinois gave a right of recovery to the personal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Whitford v. . the Panama Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Leonard v. . Columbia Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Harriman v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HaistSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  3. McGinnis v. Missouri Car & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Hartness v. Pharr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API