Legal Opinion

Avant Petroleum, Inc. v. Banque Paribas, BP North America

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1987No. Nos. 86 Civ. 3927 (EW), 86 Civ. 4032 (EW)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

At issue are four motions in two consolidated interpleader actions: (1) Plaintiffs, Avant Petroleum, Inc. and Mitsui & Co., Inc. (“Avant”), move for an order requiring defendants to interplead in these consolidated actions, discharging plaintiffs from further liability with respect to the monies deposited, making permanent the injunctive order of the Court, and awarding plaintiffs their reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees; (2) plaintiffs also move for an order pursuant to Rule 12(c) or, alternatively Rule 56, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gosa v. MaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,584 Avc Nederland B v. V. Atrium Investment Partnership, Pieter Kuik and Robert K. Lenting, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API