Bachtell v. City of Waterloo
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
This action was brought to test the legality of an arrangement for the construction and use of a civic center in the City of Waterloo. The trial court held the plan valid. Although we sympathize with the lofty public purpose of the enterprise we are compelled to conclude the plan to be illegal. We reverse.
Section 378A.3, The Code, authorizes cities under certain conditions “to lease from any nonprofit corporation * * * and operate a building or complex of buildings as a civic center * *
To this end defendant Cedar Skyline Corporation hereafter called Cedar Skyline was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Kelley v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- McCutcheon v. State Building AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Constitutionality of Chapter 280, Or. Laws 1975Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Stanfield v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Bulman v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- FISCHER AND CO., INC. v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- In the Matter of Constitutionality of Chapter 280, Or. Laws 1975Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.