Legal Opinion
Hoefer v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 7, 2000No. SACV98447-GLT[KY]PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
TAYLOR, District Judge.
On a motion for reconsideration of the federal preemption issue, the Court withdraws its May 25, 1999 order Hoefer v. Fluor Daniel, Inc., 50 F.Supp.2d 975 (C.D.Cal.1999), and issues this revised order. Concerning three issues not yet decided by the Ninth Circuit, the Court holds California’s False Claims Act does not protect federal whistleblowers, the intracorpo-rate conspiracy doctrine applies to a 42 U.S.C. § 1985 conspiracy claim, and a state wrongful employment retaliation claim is not preempted by the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Joseph L. Dombrowski v. Jack Dowling and Arthur Rubloff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States ex rel. Lupo v. Quality Assurance Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
- United States v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- United States ex rel. Ruhe v. Masimo Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- DeSoto v. Board of Parks & RecreationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Boone v. Mountainmade FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.