Legal Opinion
Burroughs v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1980No. 80 Civ. 2726PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WERKER, District Judge.
This is a motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the production of a motion picture, “Tarzan, The Ape Man,” currently being developed for production by defendant Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (“MGM”). A hearing on plaintiffs’ application was held on May 23, 27, and 28, 1980, at the conclusion of which the Court indicated it was going to deny the motion. The parties having submitted proposed and counter-proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and all of the evidence and arguments having been duly considered, the motion is hereby formally denied. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Novelty Textile Mills, Inc. v. Joan Fabrics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corporation and Richard A. HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burroughs v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Burroughs v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Baldwin v. Emi Feist Catalog, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Clonus Associates v. DREAMWORKS, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Burroughs v. Metro Goldwyn Mayer, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.