Legal Opinion

Zeitz v. Cooperstown Baseball Centennial, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMortimer B. Patterson, J.

This case was tried before the court and a jury. The only question submitted to the jury was that of damages. All other questions were reserved as questions of law, upon the decision of which, the court should direct a verdict. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $175 and $100 respectively. The facts are briefly these:

The defendant maintained a modern baseball plant consisting of a well-laid out diamond, a playing field, a covered grandstand behind the home plate and extending part of the distance toward first base, there was a series of open grandstands…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Base Ball Club Co. v. EnoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ingersoll v. Onondaga Hockey Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Club Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Crane v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Lorino v. New Orleans Baseball & Amusement Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Akins v. Glens Falls City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Hudson v. Kansas City Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Hunt v. Thomasville Baseball Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. McNiel v. Fort Worth Baseball ClubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API