Legal Opinion

United States v. Estevan Ochoa-Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2015No. 13-41258PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Estevan Ochoa-Gomez (Defendant) challenges a two-level adjustment that the district court applied to his sentence for having exercised an aggravating role in the convicted offense. Because the record plausibly supports a finding that Defendant exercised management responsibility over the property, assets, or activities of a criminal organization — actions which our Court, sitting en banc, has held may war rant an aggravating role adjustment pursuant to § 3Bl.l(c) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines — we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

I

This case arises out of a drug operation in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Nicholas HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Leonard R. FullerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Christian PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Thomas HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Michael LordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Gilberto GomezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Christopher OmigieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API