(PS) Ryan v. Spiro

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATASHA J. RYAN, No. 2:25-cv-01245-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MILDRED SPIRO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 19 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to 20 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted a declaration averring that she is unable to 21 pay the costs of this proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will…