Legal Opinion
Murray v. Wilner
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 21, 1982No. Docket 50386PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s grant of accelerated judgment dismissing her medical malpractice action.
On April 1, 1977, defendant fitted plaintiff with an intrauterine device (IUD). On February 24, 1978, defendant performed a tubal ligation on plaintiff but failed to remove the IUD. The IUD subsequently became partially imbedded in the endometrium and plaintiff became ill with endometritis. Prior to the tubal ligation plaintiff signed an arbitration agreement form. See MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq. Defendant’s motion for accelerated judgment was based on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ballard v. Southwest Detroit HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gale v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Strong v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- McCloy v. DorfmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- McKinstry v. Valley Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinic, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.