Legal Opinion

Doris Smith v. Kayla Bowwer et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 1, 2026No. 3:25-cv-05990Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 DORIS SMITH, CASE NO. 3:25-cv-5990-JNW 8 Plaintiff, DISMISSAL ORDER 9 v. 10 KAYLA BOWWER et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 The Court reviews pro se Plaintiff Doris Smith’s Amended Complaint under 14 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Smith files this action in forma pauperis (“IFP”), suing 15 Defendants Kayla Bowwer, Myla Nixon, and Melissa Garcia under

42 U.S.C. § 16

1983. Dkt. No. 12. Like the original complaint, Smith’s Amended Complaint centers 17 on interactions with Defendants during a number of family placement…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Philip Rosati v. Dr. IgbinosoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Robert M. Schucker v. Terry G. Rockwood James C. Fukuhara Dewar, Romig & Rockwood, Inc. Anne D. McGowan Delay, Laredo & McGowan Maurice JourdaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API