Legal Opinion

Causeway Investment Co. v. Nass

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1938No. 6990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge German

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

May 10, 1913, plaintiff in error, Causeway Investment Company, and defendant in error, F. J. Nass, entered into a contract by which the company agreed to sell and convey and Nass agreed to purchase certain lots in the city of Galveston. The contract price was $1,540.00, payable in monthly installments of $38.50. This contract contained a provision which all parties agreed was an “insurance provision,” and which all parties agree made the contract ultra vires and void. Prior to March 20, 1914, Nass paid on this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Mason v. PetersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Morris-Buick Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Nelson v. San Antonio Traction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Jeff Davis County v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Moore v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Rhoades v. Prudential Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. City of Austin v. North Austin State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Russell Wendt v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API