Legal Opinion

Russell Wendt v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 13, 2016No. 15-10309PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

Russell Wendt and Omar Jasso (“Plaintiffs”) appeal-the district court’s order dismissing their suit against 24 Hour Fitness' USA, Inc. (“24 Hour”) for lack of Article III standing. We affirm.

I

24 Hour operates a chain of health clubs. Plaintiffs entered into written membership contracts with 24 Hour, pursuant to which they paid 24 Hour membership dues and fees. In exchange, 24 Hour gave Plaintiffs access to its facilities for their entire membership period.

Plaintiffs now claim that their membership contracts with 24 Hour did not strictly comply with several…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Denning v. Bond PharmacyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  2. Deanda v. BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  3. Natl Infusion Center v. BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  4. Stringer v. PablosDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2018
  5. Stringer v. PablosDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API