Legal Opinion

(PC) Sanz v. Solano County Sheriff Office

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 31, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00630Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JOSEPH SANZ , No. 2:24-cv-00630 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a county prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 19

1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and motion to proceed 20 in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). 21 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 22 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing 23 fee. See 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited27 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.