Legal Opinion

U. P. R. Co. v. Broderick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Groff, J. cited: Walsh v. R. Co., 2 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 144. cited: Planh v. R. Co., 60 N Y., 607; Gibson v. R. Co., 46 Mo., 163; McGatrich v. Wason, 4 O. St., 566; Huttleton v. Machine Co., 106 Mass., 282; 3 Wood, Ry. Law, sec. 371; Snoio v. R. Co., 8 Allen [Mass.], 441; 2 Thompson, Negligence, 1015; Fairbanks v. TIaentzsahe, 73 111., 236; Dorsey v. Phillips, 42 Wis., 583.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, J.

The plaintiff below, Patrick Broderick, brought suit against the defendant to recover $1,995 damages sustained from an injury received while in the employ of the defendant, alleging that on October 15, 1886, he was so employed as a laborer, attending the masons of defendant in building the stone piers of its bridge over South Thirteenth street, in the city of Omaha; that he was acting under the direction and control of the defendant’s foreman, and without fault or negligence on his own part, while so acting with other workmen, he moved a large stone, by means of rollers, onto two planks,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ring v. KruseNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Cudahy Packing Co. v. RoyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Poos v. Fred Krug Brewing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API