Legal Opinion

State v. Doran

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1983No. 82-1193PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

This appeal poses several previously unanswered questions significant to the administration of criminal justice in this state. First, we are asked to define the defense of entrapment. Second, we must decide whether entrapment is an affirmative defense. The final issue presented is whether a trial court commits prejudicial error by failing to allocate any burden of proof on the entrapment defense.

I

We must initially choose between defining entrapment under the “subjective” or “objective” test. Succinctly stated, the subjective test of entrapment focuses upon the predisposition of the accused to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. State v. MelchiorOhio Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Zoltan Takacs v. Ted EngleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API