Legal Opinion

United States v. Santiago

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 2, 2010No. 09-10466PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question of whether a guilty plea followed by a sentence of probation and a withholding of adjudication qualifies under Florida law as a predicate conviction for the purpose of enhancing a defendant’s sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Defendant Euladio Santiago, Jr. pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The government argued that Santiago had three prior felony convictions, mandating an enhanced sentence under the ACCA. At sentencing, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony Leon Sweeting and Joseph Leander SweetingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Raulerson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. United States v. Alphonso James, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. State v. GazdaSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Ted PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Marcus NoelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Curtis Lee Dallas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Santiago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. Anthony Brian JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API