Pagnini v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TROTTER, P. J.-
Petitioner asks us to determine he was denied a speedy trial by real party’s failure to bring him to trial within 60 days of our order denying his writ application and dissolving our previously issued stay order. We conclude the pendency in the California Supreme Court of petitioner’s subsequent application for extraordinary relief constituted statutory good cause sufficient to excuse any failure to timely bring petitioner to trial. We further find petitioner waived his speedy trial rights by seeking a stay of his trial and other affirmative relief from the Supreme Court.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Sykes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. TahtinenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. VillanuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011