Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CHURCH

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 30, 1968PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 N.J. Super. 495 (1968)

242 A.2d 652

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

DAGNEY G. CHURCH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND GEORGE M. GALE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 25, 1968.

Decided April 30, 1968.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Richard E. Arvidson argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Schneider & Morgan, attorneys).

Mr. Louis Ruprecht argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Gaffey, Webb & McDermott, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLOVSKY, J.A.D.

On August 3, 1964 a truck and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Public Service Elec. and Gas Co. v. WaldroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Reardon v. AllenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Smith v. Red Top Taxicab Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Ochs v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prevratil v. MohrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Gareeb v. WeinsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Burrell v. QuarantaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Petrocelli v. Daniel Woodhead Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Barry A. Kozyra, Arbitrator, Geraldine Della Buono v. Paul J. Allen M & G Convoy, Third-Party v. Angelo Soldani, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API