Legal Opinion

People v. Ruiz

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1992No. C011478PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, J.

After denial of his motion to disclose the identity of a confidential informant (Cl) who witnessed the transaction, defendant was convicted of selling methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.) On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in denying the motion.

Because the Cl did not testify at the in camera hearing on defendant’s motion to disclose the informant’s identity, we shall reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further in camera proceedings. As we shall explain, the fact the Cl witnessed the alleged methamphetamine transaction does not necessarily…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. People v. LanfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API