Legal Opinion

People v. Lee

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1985No. F003954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

Defendant was charged with possession of phencyclidine (PCP) for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378.5.) Defendant moved for discovery and disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant. The court conducted an in camera hearing to question the informant and after the closed examination denied defendant’s motion. Thereafter, the trial court, sitting without a jury, found defendant guilty as charged. The trial court granted defendant probation on the condition she serve a preliminary period of local incarceration of 365 days. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal.

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. LanfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Orange County Social Services Agency v. Stacy S.California Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API