Legal Opinion

Van Vacter v. Hierholzer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1993No. WD 45909PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

Judy Van Vacter and her children appeal the jury’s verdict in their wrongful death action arising out of Jerry Van Vacter’s death. The jury found that Rebecca Hier-holzer and Mary Coltharp, the treating physicians, negligently treated Van Vacter’s condition, but it assessed only one percent fault to Hierholzer and six percent fault to Col-tharp. It returned a verdict of no damages. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

In January 1982, at the age of 40, Van Vacter survived a major heart attack. Physicians discovered that he was suffering severe arterial disease. Some of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Matthews v. WillifordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Hagen v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Duke v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vintila v. DrassenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. DeMoss v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Wolbers v. the Finley Hosp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  4. James A. Williams Rita R. Williams v. Don A. Birkeness Birkeness Chiropractic Clinic Harry Lounce Spelman-St. Luke's Hospital Socorro S. LampaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Esmond v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API