Legal Opinion

Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co. v. American Can Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 5, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Agency of the Canadian Car & Foundry Company, Limited, and the Recording & Computing Machines Company, against the American Can Company.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

The suit is to recover $1,500,000 with interest. Defendant concedes, and always has conceded, that it owes $1,500,000 to somebody; but, because of certain transactions and documents, defendant’s position is that it cannot safely pay the money to plaintiffs, and that it may hereafter be subject to a judgment or decree in some suit or action which may be brought by some “Russian government.”

Two principal propositions are relied upon by plaintiffs:(1) That under the documents and transactions in the case the Russian government has not any beneficial interest in the money…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. The SapphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. In Re BaizSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  2. The RogdaiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1920
  3. Russian Government v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1919
  4. The AdriaticCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
  5. Russian Government v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API