Legal Opinion

Scott v. Budd Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1968No. Calendar No. 32, Docket No. 51,720PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The main question in this case is the construction of the following language in effect at the time of these proceedings which was contained in section 29(1) (b) of the Michigan employment security act as amended by PA 1963, No 226 (CLS 1961, § 421.29, as amended [Stat Ann 1963 Cum Supp § 17.531]):

“An individual shall be disqualified for benefits:
“For any week with respect to which his total or partial unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress, or to shutdown or start-up operations caused by such labor dispute, in the establishment in which he is or was last employed. * * * No…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bedwell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Buzza v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RuuskaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API