Legal Opinion

Nehi Corp. v. Mission Dry Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 16, 1954No. 11284_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The district court dismissed Nehi Corporation’s action to cancel Mission Dry Corporation’s registered trade-mark for soft drinks and bases and concentrates for preparing same. Nehi appeals.

Its first proposition is that Mission’s trade-mark “Royal Punch” is confusingly similar to its trade-mark “Royal Crown” when both are applied to soft drinks. It reasons that the test for confusion is applied to ordinary purchasers; that the ordinary purchasers of soft drinks are careless and casual purchasers ; therefore the confusion test in this instance should be applied to careless and casual purchasers.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  4. Nehi Corp. v. Mission Dry Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. Smith Bowman Distillery, Inc. v. Schenley Distillers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  2. Johnson & Johnson v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API