Badowski v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This patent suit is now before the court on defendant’s third motion for a new trial. This motion was filed on February 10, 1958, nearly two years after the court’s opinion delivered on May 1, 1956, 135 Ct.Cl. 93, 140 F.Supp. 544, 545. In this opinion we held that certain claims of plaintiff’s patent, entitled “Automatic Means for Opening Parachutes,” had not been anticipated by the prior art and were valid, and had been infringed by defendant’s F-l parachute release device. After publication of this opinion, defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which we overruled on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Kuhne Identification Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- The Garrett Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Strumskis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Witold A. Badowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.