Legal Opinion

Reimann v. New York Central Rd.

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided February 25, 1971No. Nos. 809367 and 874441PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMonagle, J.

In the Reimann case, the court had previously overruled a motion to dismiss. The defendant, *82New York Central Railroad Company, filed an application for reconsideration in which they concede that the motion to dismiss was probably not a proper motion, bnt that they desire that it be treated by the conrt as a motion to stay proceedings. The court has therefore granted the motion for reconsideration and is treating the instrument filed in the Reimann case as a motion for a stay of proceedings.

There is now for the decision of the court, a motion to stay proceedings in each of the above cases.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Addison Township v. GoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Boylan v. NashNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Hisey v. Reading Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API