Legal Opinion

BERGSTEINs v. EMERSON CONVALESCENT CENTER, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 22, 2021No. 2:16-cv-08009Unknown

1Opinion

Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHAIM MOSHE BERGSTEIN, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 16-8009-JMV-AME v. EMERSON CONVALESCENT CENTER, OPINION INC., Defendant. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. The present matter comes before the Court on Defendant Emerson Convalescent Center, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Emerson”) motion for summary judgment. D.E. 83. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. D.E. 87. The motion was decided without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Civil Rule 78.1. The Court has considered the parties’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API